...


so as chasing the horizon would bring the individual to the starting point with nothing much to the END ( well, even that all depends on one's perspective, since sometimes just the journey is a helluvah experience, but not to the FINAL end of the sympathized collection), it may be ( as i don't confer to the definition of RIGHT or WRONG) accelerating for the WHATEVER end of the individual, will it be for the collection or not, i can't say.since whatever is the presupposed or preconceived GOOD of the collection goes for a toss ( in the long run ) as the journey changes and developes itself and in doing so the so thought final GOOD...

similarly

... one can use N number of analogies but rest assured the outcome would be the same...


..so.. i guess it would be the best policy if the individual thinks for his/her own GOOD, RIGHT, WRONG, Whatever, one should use ones RATIONALITY to the limit of being once own ENEMY ( if you please ) and not confer to any ideologies or for the matter of fact any of the -ogies, and be truly and extremely judgmental of ones thoughts and actions which might be a seeming enimosity to the SELF, but thats the true path of RIGHTEOUSNESS


... though it may sound sadistic, but as i say

" From Unadulterated and Rational Sadism Erupts ETERNAL BLISS "

....adieu

Now that what i call a tea break :D....


..anyways...


so as i was saying, since it can be logically concluded that almost all individuals belong to one collection or another, how can one conclude that there is a common good, since each one of us is compartmentalized as far as our interests and views are concerned, which in turn leads to a final good of a particular interest ( the index of its goodness and wrongness is a discussion of different dimension ), though even that is not such an easy task to accomplish, since one can never clearly identify a FINAL good, its a complex process of hit and trials, wherein the process improves and changes itself and its so called previously thought FINAL GOOD ( and this goes on, meaning, there is no ACTUAL final good, its like chasing the horizon)

...

....

To think is to human.....



does that mean that thinking is HUMANE?


.
.
.
.
.

~~~Reply~~~
.
.
.

if to think is humane, who can blame the extremists, 'cause they do think and sometimes they think what no one has ever thought before, but the humane nature breaths in corrective and collective thinking (will get to those terms shortly), 'cause all that which moves and reacts, thinks ( i guess), but that which results in the benefit ( so called ) of the collection ( we all do live in collections, wether we believe it or not, collections of ideologies, collection of prejudices, collection of likes, collection of dislikes, collection of right and wrong, collections of success and failures and so on and so forth) is considered to be the RIGHT thinking, and as an individual do confer to the collection to which he/she sympathizes with, it will directly or indirectly, consiously or unconsiouly will result into his/her own PROFIT/GOOD ( though generally its the former that takes precedance)....


....goto go for a tea break...


....